How can a human being call himself the anointed and Muhammed?
Deluded, I'll tell you.
All things written have to take place according to the BIBLE, the TRUE WORD OF GOD. The Faithful Slave
so for our "congregation book study", we are still deeply mired in the bible teach book.
this week's lesson talks about the whole idea that the book of job relates the central issue of the entire cosmos, a vital issue raised by satan, where satan questions whether humans follow god because of what they are given, or because he deserves it.
i'm surprised that the book of job, obviously archetypal and figurative (for example, i doubt people back then literally spoke for hours in hebrew verse, and i doubt that four messengers showed up all in a row with stories telling that they, only they, got away to tell of a disaster) even has a place in the canon; aside from its lack of any specific historical position or accuracy, the argument it advances (especially as the society interprets it) is facile: the idea that privileged, wealthy, powerful job somehow stands as a representative for all humanity and serves as a litmus test for man's interaction with god is downright silly.
How can a human being call himself the anointed and Muhammed?
Deluded, I'll tell you.
All things written have to take place according to the BIBLE, the TRUE WORD OF GOD. The Faithful Slave
so for our "congregation book study", we are still deeply mired in the bible teach book.
this week's lesson talks about the whole idea that the book of job relates the central issue of the entire cosmos, a vital issue raised by satan, where satan questions whether humans follow god because of what they are given, or because he deserves it.
i'm surprised that the book of job, obviously archetypal and figurative (for example, i doubt people back then literally spoke for hours in hebrew verse, and i doubt that four messengers showed up all in a row with stories telling that they, only they, got away to tell of a disaster) even has a place in the canon; aside from its lack of any specific historical position or accuracy, the argument it advances (especially as the society interprets it) is facile: the idea that privileged, wealthy, powerful job somehow stands as a representative for all humanity and serves as a litmus test for man's interaction with god is downright silly.
You will bow before JAH, as you know Him, very soon.......The Faithful Slave of JAH and CHRIST
i doubt it. I personally doubt the existence of Jah, and I'm beginning to wonder if you're real.
It's obvious you're not all there.
Explain to me in detail how the reproductive system that creates offspring functions, and then get back to me. How can a human with intelligence even begin to think we do not have a Master Designer? Pitiful I tell you.
The Faithful Slave
so for our "congregation book study", we are still deeply mired in the bible teach book.
this week's lesson talks about the whole idea that the book of job relates the central issue of the entire cosmos, a vital issue raised by satan, where satan questions whether humans follow god because of what they are given, or because he deserves it.
i'm surprised that the book of job, obviously archetypal and figurative (for example, i doubt people back then literally spoke for hours in hebrew verse, and i doubt that four messengers showed up all in a row with stories telling that they, only they, got away to tell of a disaster) even has a place in the canon; aside from its lack of any specific historical position or accuracy, the argument it advances (especially as the society interprets it) is facile: the idea that privileged, wealthy, powerful job somehow stands as a representative for all humanity and serves as a litmus test for man's interaction with god is downright silly.
Do not worry, you all will meet me in person soon.......I carry the Strength of The Almighty GOD and Jesus Christ. You will bow before JAH, as you know Him, very soon.......
The Faithful Slave of JAH and CHRIST
so for our "congregation book study", we are still deeply mired in the bible teach book.
this week's lesson talks about the whole idea that the book of job relates the central issue of the entire cosmos, a vital issue raised by satan, where satan questions whether humans follow god because of what they are given, or because he deserves it.
i'm surprised that the book of job, obviously archetypal and figurative (for example, i doubt people back then literally spoke for hours in hebrew verse, and i doubt that four messengers showed up all in a row with stories telling that they, only they, got away to tell of a disaster) even has a place in the canon; aside from its lack of any specific historical position or accuracy, the argument it advances (especially as the society interprets it) is facile: the idea that privileged, wealthy, powerful job somehow stands as a representative for all humanity and serves as a litmus test for man's interaction with god is downright silly.
Kid-A:
You will be forgiven after a conversation with you from The Most High GOD, You WILL respect those that He sends forth.
The Faithful Slave
so for our "congregation book study", we are still deeply mired in the bible teach book.
this week's lesson talks about the whole idea that the book of job relates the central issue of the entire cosmos, a vital issue raised by satan, where satan questions whether humans follow god because of what they are given, or because he deserves it.
i'm surprised that the book of job, obviously archetypal and figurative (for example, i doubt people back then literally spoke for hours in hebrew verse, and i doubt that four messengers showed up all in a row with stories telling that they, only they, got away to tell of a disaster) even has a place in the canon; aside from its lack of any specific historical position or accuracy, the argument it advances (especially as the society interprets it) is facile: the idea that privileged, wealthy, powerful job somehow stands as a representative for all humanity and serves as a litmus test for man's interaction with god is downright silly.
I read a bit of your brownboy stuff. Do you still consider yourself to be Muhammed, or have you dropped that title? You haven't mentioned it in this thread yet.
If I had stuff in my head anything like you have in yours, I'd see a shrink.
Muhammed is the messenger or prophet of Allah. The Almighty is known to different faiths by many names but is still The TRUE GOD known as YHWH. The faithful slave is the True Muhammed in fulfillment. They were actually awaiting my arrival. The Faithful Slave
so for our "congregation book study", we are still deeply mired in the bible teach book.
this week's lesson talks about the whole idea that the book of job relates the central issue of the entire cosmos, a vital issue raised by satan, where satan questions whether humans follow god because of what they are given, or because he deserves it.
i'm surprised that the book of job, obviously archetypal and figurative (for example, i doubt people back then literally spoke for hours in hebrew verse, and i doubt that four messengers showed up all in a row with stories telling that they, only they, got away to tell of a disaster) even has a place in the canon; aside from its lack of any specific historical position or accuracy, the argument it advances (especially as the society interprets it) is facile: the idea that privileged, wealthy, powerful job somehow stands as a representative for all humanity and serves as a litmus test for man's interaction with god is downright silly.
The birth of the faithful and discreet slave:
http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/member/11560/topics/default.ashx
Read at your own leisure if you care to.
(some topics were deleted for some unknown reason. JAH knows by whom, and will approach those with explanation of all written messages from JAH Himself, accomplished through my hands.)
The Faithful Slave of JAH and CHRIST
so for our "congregation book study", we are still deeply mired in the bible teach book.
this week's lesson talks about the whole idea that the book of job relates the central issue of the entire cosmos, a vital issue raised by satan, where satan questions whether humans follow god because of what they are given, or because he deserves it.
i'm surprised that the book of job, obviously archetypal and figurative (for example, i doubt people back then literally spoke for hours in hebrew verse, and i doubt that four messengers showed up all in a row with stories telling that they, only they, got away to tell of a disaster) even has a place in the canon; aside from its lack of any specific historical position or accuracy, the argument it advances (especially as the society interprets it) is facile: the idea that privileged, wealthy, powerful job somehow stands as a representative for all humanity and serves as a litmus test for man's interaction with god is downright silly.
Mr E,
Please return the $20,000 that my widowed mother gave your company (WTBT). I believe it was to "help the work" wink wink, nudge nudge. If you are unable to do this then I guess you have no way to prove who you are. Unless.......You speak to Jehovah and make a miracle happen. How about this one...."And see, by my own hand Monkeys did indeed fly out of his Ass"
If at sometime this week a Monkey of any type flys out of my ass, then indeed I will go back to the hall and praise the names of the faithful and discreet slave.
not so respectfully - Asheron
The faithful and discreet slave does not belong to any human organization upon the earth, but was bought from the earth with the Blood Sacrifice of Jesus Christ, my Master under authority of The Almighty GOD JAH.
I am your first miracle, the first human representative of The Alimghty upon the earth since Jesus Christ and the men of old. The Faithful Slave P.S. your money will be returned to you when it has no value, if you still want it.......so for our "congregation book study", we are still deeply mired in the bible teach book.
this week's lesson talks about the whole idea that the book of job relates the central issue of the entire cosmos, a vital issue raised by satan, where satan questions whether humans follow god because of what they are given, or because he deserves it.
i'm surprised that the book of job, obviously archetypal and figurative (for example, i doubt people back then literally spoke for hours in hebrew verse, and i doubt that four messengers showed up all in a row with stories telling that they, only they, got away to tell of a disaster) even has a place in the canon; aside from its lack of any specific historical position or accuracy, the argument it advances (especially as the society interprets it) is facile: the idea that privileged, wealthy, powerful job somehow stands as a representative for all humanity and serves as a litmus test for man's interaction with god is downright silly.
One question: Who are the Holy Ones? Revelations 13:7
If I believed the bible, which I don't, I would say that's talking about the anointed of jehovah, which doesn't prove that you are who or what you say you are.
If you do not even believe in the bible, then we have no basis for understanding so why bother? I am not a "Holy One" but am the ONLY anointed upon the earth. One who is anointed recieves authority in kingship, and will sit upon the throne of David. This is Truly who the faithful and discreet slave is. The Holy Ones are those who are defending their homeland against the wild beasts in the Middle East. (Matthew 24:9-14) The Faithful Slave
so for our "congregation book study", we are still deeply mired in the bible teach book.
this week's lesson talks about the whole idea that the book of job relates the central issue of the entire cosmos, a vital issue raised by satan, where satan questions whether humans follow god because of what they are given, or because he deserves it.
i'm surprised that the book of job, obviously archetypal and figurative (for example, i doubt people back then literally spoke for hours in hebrew verse, and i doubt that four messengers showed up all in a row with stories telling that they, only they, got away to tell of a disaster) even has a place in the canon; aside from its lack of any specific historical position or accuracy, the argument it advances (especially as the society interprets it) is facile: the idea that privileged, wealthy, powerful job somehow stands as a representative for all humanity and serves as a litmus test for man's interaction with god is downright silly.
What question?
It's kind of difficult to communicate with someone who repeatedly claims to be the anointed of jehovah, without presenting any evidence to prove the assertion. Prove that and you might get some respect in here.
One question: Who are the Holy Ones? Revelations 13:7
so for our "congregation book study", we are still deeply mired in the bible teach book.
this week's lesson talks about the whole idea that the book of job relates the central issue of the entire cosmos, a vital issue raised by satan, where satan questions whether humans follow god because of what they are given, or because he deserves it.
i'm surprised that the book of job, obviously archetypal and figurative (for example, i doubt people back then literally spoke for hours in hebrew verse, and i doubt that four messengers showed up all in a row with stories telling that they, only they, got away to tell of a disaster) even has a place in the canon; aside from its lack of any specific historical position or accuracy, the argument it advances (especially as the society interprets it) is facile: the idea that privileged, wealthy, powerful job somehow stands as a representative for all humanity and serves as a litmus test for man's interaction with god is downright silly.
If none of you can identify the "Holy Ones" of the Most High, then you missed out on significant fulfillment of prophecy. None of you have ever even attempted to make a response to this question.
The Faithful Slave